Blog

goDown

Remote Control Train Operations: What You Should Know


man holding hard hat standing in front of train locomotive in train yardIn an era where technology continually reshapes our lives, the realm of rail transportation is not left behind. Remote control train operations (RCTO) have emerged as a groundbreaking development in the railroad industry. 

This sophisticated mechanism allows for the remote operation of trains, enhancing efficiency and safety in rail transport. As individuals or entities involved in the railroad sector, understanding RCTO is crucial, especially when considering legal aspects related to railroad injuries and settlements.

This article offers an in-depth exploration of Remote Control Train Operations (RCTO), providing clarity on the technology’s operational benefits and legal implications within the railroad industry

  1. What is Remote Control Train Operations (RCTO)?

RCO is a system that allows a single operator to control a locomotive from a remote location. The operator uses a handheld controller or a computer interface to send commands to the locomotive, which executes the commands.

There are two main types of RCO systems: line-of-sight and non-line-of-sight. Line-of-sight RCO systems require the operator to have a clear view of the locomotive. Non-line-of-sight RCO systems do not require the operator to have a clear view of the locomotive, but they rely on sensors and cameras to provide the operator with information about the locomotive’s surroundings.

RCO is most commonly used in rail yards, where locomotives are used to move cars around and assemble trains. However, RCO is also being used on some main lines, particularly for short-distance freight trains.

  1. What are the benefits of RCTO?

There are several benefits to using RCO.

  • RCO can improve safety by reducing the risk of accidents caused by human error. For example, RCO can eliminate the risk of accidents caused by locomotive engineers falling asleep or distracted by other tasks.
  • RCO can improve efficiency by allowing trains to be operated more quickly and precisely. For example, RCO can allow locomotives to be coupled and uncoupled without the need for human intervention.
  • RCO can reduce costs by eliminating the need for a locomotive engineer to be present in the cab of the locomotive.
  1. How does RCTO affect the legal landscape in the railroad industry?

RCTO changes the nature of work-related injuries, impacting legal proceedings under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA). Understanding FELA in the context of RCTO is essential for railroad workers and employers.

  1. How do RCTO and FELA interact?

FELA provides a legal framework for railroad workers injured on the job. RCTO’s alteration of traditional operations affects the nature of work-related injuries and legal proceedings under FELA.

  1. What impact does RCTO have on railroad injury settlements?

RCTO can significantly affect settlements for railroad injuries, including shoulder and back injuries. The technology’s influence on injury frequency and nature could impact settlement amounts.

  1. Can Cahill & Perry, P.C. Attorneys at Law handle RCTO-related legal cases?

Yes, Cahill & Perry, P.C. are equipped to manage legal matters related to RCTO, including injury claims and settlement negotiations.

  1. What is RCO in the context of RCTO?

RCO (Remote Control Operations) is a system where an operator controls a locomotive remotely, either line-of-sight or non-line-of-sight, commonly used in rail yards and on some main lines.

  1. What concerns are associated with RCO?

Concerns include potential job losses, vulnerability to cyberattacks, and safety risks like communication disruptions, sensor malfunctions, and human error.

  1. How are safety concerns about RCO being addressed?

The railroad industry and regulatory bodies like the FRA are implementing safety measures like redundant communication systems, sensor redundancy, and comprehensive operator training.

  1. Are Connecticut railroad injury lawyers knowledgeable about RCTO?

Yes, Connecticut railroad injury lawyers have knowledge in RCTO-related cases and can provide legal assistance.

  1. What should I expect from railroad disability lawyers at Cahill & Perry, P.C. Attorneys at Law?

The introduction of Remote Control Train Operations marks a significant shift in the railroad industry, bringing both opportunities and challenges. As legal professionals, especially those involved in railroad injury law, adapt to this new landscape, it is essential to stay informed and prepared. For those affected by railroad-related injuries, seeking legal counsel from knowledgeable railroad injury attorneys is vital.

If you or someone you know is navigating the complexities of a railroad injury case, reach out to Cahill & Perry, P.C. Attorneys at Law. With their extensive experience in railroad injury law, they are well-equipped to guide you through the FELA claims process and work towards securing the settlement you deserve. Remember, in the evolving world of railroad technology, having the right legal partner can make all the difference. Contact us today to learn more about how we can assist you.

  • $10.8 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Conductor wrongful death case. (Avery v. Metro-North RR).
  • $8 Million settlement for an Amtrak Trackman who sustained a crushed leg. (Cevasco v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.).
  • $7 Million settlement for a Metro-North Foreman whose legs were amputated. (Renert v. Metro-North RR).
  • $5.8 Million settlement for an Amtrak Conductor who sustained a head injury. (Fitzpatrick v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.).
  • $5.5 Million settlement for a Metro-North Machinist wrongful death case. (Pieger v. Metro-North RR).
  • $4.3 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Conductor wrongful death case. (Ard v. Metro-North RR)
  • $2.57 Million Verdict for an Amtrak Conductor who sustained a back injury. (Pace v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.).
  • $2.5 Million Settlement for a Metro-North employee who sustained a serious head injury.
  • Settled for a Confidential Sum for a Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company Trackman wrongful death case. (Macaulay v. Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company.)
  • $6.250 Million Verdict in 2023 which was later reduced to $2.1 Million for a Metro-North Structural Welder/Ironworker who sustained head and neck injuries and has returned to work. (Torres v. Metro-North RR).
  • $2 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Lineman who sustained an electrical burn (Curly v. Metro-North RR).
  • $2 Million Settlement in 2020 for a Providence & Worcester Railroad Company Conductor who sustained a serious head injury and returned to work for another RR as an Engineer. (Scarpa v. Providence & Worcester Railroad Company.)
  • $2 Million Settlement for a Metro-North Conductor who sustained a fractured leg.
    Settled for a Confidential Sum in 2019 an Amtrak Lineman involving an electrocution causing a permanent occupational disability. (Anderson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.).
  • $1.85 Million Verdict for an Amtrak Ticket Agent who was assaulted. (Schneider v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.)
  • Compensatory and punitive damages Verdicts and subsequently settled for $1.8 Million in 2023 for a Metro-North
  • Conductor who suffered Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. (Moran v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority).
  • $1.69 Million Settlement for an Amtrak Supervisor who was shot by an employee. (Cornelius v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.)
  • $1.65 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Lineman who sustained foot and ankle injuries. (Keating v. Metro-North RR).
  • $1.65 Million Verdict for a Metro-North TA Employee who sustained an Open Tibia Fracture to his left leg. (Rivera v. Metro-North RR).
  • $1.54 Million Verdict for an Amtrak General Foreman who sustained a herniated disc in his lower back. (Brady v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation).
  • $1.45 Million Verdict for a Construction Worker who sustained a left hip injury. (Quintiliani v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation).
  • $1.42 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Machinist who sustained a fractured rib and a herniated disc. (Hall v. Metro-North RR).
  • $1.4 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Mechanical Gang Foreman who sustained burns from an explosion of steam on an engine. (Berry v. Metro-North RR).
  • $1.4 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Carpenter Foreman who sustained a back injury. (Kendall v. Metro-North RR).
  • $1.3 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Signal Trainee Maintainer who sustained a back injury from a slip and fall. (Moran v. Metro-North RR).
  • $1.2 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Signal Maintainer who sustained a back injury and post-concussion syndrome. (Manes v. Metro-North RR).
  • $1.2 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Trackman who sustained crushed legs. (Murillo v. Metro-North RR).
  • $1 Million Settlement for a Metro-North Trackman who sustained burns from pot welding and subsequently returned to work. (Burke v. Metro-North RR).

find yourself a Railroad Law Attorney | Call 800-654-7245

CALL OR EMAIL US TODAY TO GET STARTED

If you are a railroad worker who has been injured on the job, you need a lawyer who understands the complicated FELA claims process. Find out how we can help you receive the compensation you deserve.

Protecting Injured Railroad Workers,
Passengers And Families
40 years of experience

New Haven Office

43 Trumbull Street
New Haven, CT 06510
Toll Free: 800-654-7245

Phone: 203-777-1000
Fax: 203-865-5904
directions

Boston Office

470 Atlantic Avenue, 4th Floor
Boston, MA 02210

Phone: (617) 217-2920
directions

arla

New York Office

Chrysler Building
405 Lexington Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, NY 10174

Toll Free: 800-654-7245
Phone: 212-453-7300
directions

connect with us