Blog

goDown

FELA Statute of Limitations


statute of limitationsIn an era marked by rapid industrial advancements and a heightened focus on workers’ rights, understanding the legal protections available to individuals is crucial. This is especially true for railroad employees who work in an industry fraught with potential hazards. 

The Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) was established over a century ago to protect railroad workers who get injured on the job. However, being familiar with its aspects, such as the statute of limitations, is crucial, as failing to understand this might derail your case. 

Unfortunately, many injured workers, engulfed in the challenges of physical recovery and financial uncertainty, may overlook these critical details. To address this issue, this article aims to provide a comprehensive guide on the FELA statute of limitations.

What Is the Statute of Limitations?

The Statute of Limitations, in the context of the law, is a critical term to understand. It refers to a legally prescribed time limit within which legal action must be initiated. This time limit varies depending on the nature of the offense or claim. 

It’s an integral part of civil and criminal law, designed to ensure fairness and efficacy in the legal system. Simply put, it represents a deadline, and once this deadline has passed, the right to sue or prosecute typically expires.

In essence, the statute of limitations helps balance the scales of justice, promoting prompt action while also preventing potential abuse of the legal system.

FELA Statute of Limitations

The FELA Statute of Limitations stipulates a 3-year period from the date the cause of action accrues. This means that a FELA claim must be filed within three years from the date of the injury. If you miss this window, you could lose your right to seek compensation.

Contrastingly, other personal injury claims may have different timeframes depending on the state law, but FELA’s three-year rule is a federal law and thus applies nationwide.

Exceptions and Special Cases in FELA’s Statute of Limitations

While the 3-year rule generally applies, certain scenarios can extend or shorten the period. The delayed discovery doctrine applies when a worker cannot reasonably understand the cause of their injury within the 3-year window. In such cases, the clock may start when the employee becomes aware of this link.

If a worker suffers from an occupational disease or a long-term injury, the clock starts ticking when the worker knew or reasonably should have known, about the injury and its connection to their employment.

Consequences of Missing the FELA Statute of Limitations

The consequences of missing the FELA statute of limitations can be far-reaching and generally disadvantageous for the injured worker. To put it bluntly, if you fail to file your FELA claim within the designated three-year window, your claim will likely be dismissed. This means you lose the legal right to seek compensation for your injuries. 

The court system is stringent with these timeframes, and exceptions are rarely made, underscoring the critical need to act swiftly following an injury or the discovery of an occupational disease.

Beyond the immediate legal implications, missing the FELA statute of limitations can also have severe personal and financial ramifications. Medical bills, rehabilitation costs, and lost wages can quickly accumulate following an injury, creating a financial burden for the injured worker and their family. By missing the opportunity to file a FELA claim, the injured worker could lose the chance to alleviate these financial pressures through compensation. 

This unfortunate situation reinforces the necessity of promptly seeking FELA attorneys when an injury occurs to navigate the intricacies of the FELA claims process effectively and within the established timeframe.

Seek a FELA Attorney Right Away

Understanding and navigating the intricacies of the FELA claims process can be challenging. That’s where the role of our FELA attorney comes in. We can help you determine when your statute of limitations begins and ends, taking into account any exceptions that might apply.

Moreover, a competent lawyer at Cahill & Perry, P.C. can guide you through the FELA claims process, ensuring that you preserve your rights and enhance your chances of a successful claim. Cahill & Perry, P.C. is renowned for having some of the best FELA attorneys who are experienced in representing FELA claims for railroad employees.

If you or someone you know is struggling with a FELA claim, don’t hesitate to reach out to the best FELA attorneys at Cahill & Perry, P.C. Our knowledge and experience will ensure your case is handled effectively, offering you the best chance at securing the compensation you deserve.

  • $10.8 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Conductor wrongful death case. (Avery v. Metro-North RR).
  • $8 Million settlement for an Amtrak Trackman who sustained a crushed leg. (Cevasco v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.).
  • $7 Million settlement for a Metro-North Foreman whose legs were amputated. (Renert v. Metro-North RR).
  • $5.8 Million settlement for an Amtrak Conductor who sustained a head injury. (Fitzpatrick v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.).
  • $5.5 Million settlement for a Metro-North Machinist wrongful death case. (Pieger v. Metro-North RR).
  • $4.3 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Conductor wrongful death case. (Ard v. Metro-North RR)
  • $2.57 Million Verdict for an Amtrak Conductor who sustained a back injury. (Pace v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.).
  • $2.5 Million Settlement for a Metro-North employee who sustained a serious head injury.
  • Settled for a Confidential Sum for a Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company Trackman wrongful death case. (Macaulay v. Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company.)
  • $6.250 Million Verdict in 2023 which was later reduced to $2.1 Million for a Metro-North Structural Welder/Ironworker who sustained head and neck injuries and has returned to work. (Torres v. Metro-North RR).
  • $2 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Lineman who sustained an electrical burn (Curly v. Metro-North RR).
  • $2 Million Settlement in 2020 for a Providence & Worcester Railroad Company Conductor who sustained a serious head injury and returned to work for another RR as an Engineer. (Scarpa v. Providence & Worcester Railroad Company.)
  • $2 Million Settlement for a Metro-North Conductor who sustained a fractured leg.
    Settled for a Confidential Sum in 2019 an Amtrak Lineman involving an electrocution causing a permanent occupational disability. (Anderson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.).
  • $1.85 Million Verdict for an Amtrak Ticket Agent who was assaulted. (Schneider v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.)
  • Compensatory and punitive damages Verdicts and subsequently settled for $1.8 Million in 2023 for a Metro-North
  • Conductor who suffered Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. (Moran v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority).
  • $1.69 Million Settlement for an Amtrak Supervisor who was shot by an employee. (Cornelius v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.)
  • $1.65 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Lineman who sustained foot and ankle injuries. (Keating v. Metro-North RR).
  • $1.65 Million Verdict for a Metro-North TA Employee who sustained an Open Tibia Fracture to his left leg. (Rivera v. Metro-North RR).
  • $1.54 Million Verdict for an Amtrak General Foreman who sustained a herniated disc in his lower back. (Brady v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation).
  • $1.45 Million Verdict for a Construction Worker who sustained a left hip injury. (Quintiliani v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation).
  • $1.42 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Machinist who sustained a fractured rib and a herniated disc. (Hall v. Metro-North RR).
  • $1.4 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Mechanical Gang Foreman who sustained burns from an explosion of steam on an engine. (Berry v. Metro-North RR).
  • $1.4 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Carpenter Foreman who sustained a back injury. (Kendall v. Metro-North RR).
  • $1.3 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Signal Trainee Maintainer who sustained a back injury from a slip and fall. (Moran v. Metro-North RR).
  • $1.2 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Signal Maintainer who sustained a back injury and post-concussion syndrome. (Manes v. Metro-North RR).
  • $1.2 Million Verdict for a Metro-North Trackman who sustained crushed legs. (Murillo v. Metro-North RR).
  • $1 Million Settlement for a Metro-North Trackman who sustained burns from pot welding and subsequently returned to work. (Burke v. Metro-North RR).

find yourself a Railroad Law Attorney | Call 800-654-7245

CALL OR EMAIL US TODAY TO GET STARTED

If you are a railroad worker who has been injured on the job, you need a lawyer who understands the complicated FELA claims process. Find out how we can help you receive the compensation you deserve.

Protecting Injured Railroad Workers,
Passengers And Families
40 years of experience

New Haven Office

43 Trumbull Street
New Haven, CT 06510
Toll Free: 800-654-7245

Phone: 203-777-1000
Fax: 203-865-5904
directions

Boston Office

470 Atlantic Avenue, 4th Floor
Boston, MA 02210

Phone: (617) 217-2920
directions

arla

New York Office

Chrysler Building
405 Lexington Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, NY 10174

Toll Free: 800-654-7245
Phone: 212-453-7300
directions

connect with us